User talk:Dekkappai
(Archive 1: Feb-Aug 2008: Return to BP, Prophecy begins Filmography dev't)
(Archive 2: Aug 2008: Finish Film template discussion)
(Archive 3: Aug-Sep 2008: Implementing film templates)
Amazon link
Hey, I didn't know we had an Amazon affiliate thing. :) For search URLs at Amazon.co.jp, I think adding &tag=boobpedia-22 to the end of the URL should work. I'm not sure how it works with links to product pages at Amazon Japan, though. The Honorable 20:47, 24 September 2008 (EDT)
Minka
I think the way your suggestion for clarifying that Minka is from South Korea but works in the U.S. is fine. The Honorable 18:39, 27 September 2008 (EDT)
ID links
I see absolutely no problem. GAS-45 or GAS 45 is a unique identifier, and a person who searches would be happy to be led to the article - at least I think so. No one would search for a gas station here. :-) Prophecy 16:02, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
"Unreferenced" tag
Please be careful about calling edits "vandalism"; an "unreferenced" tag to an article is usually well intentioned, and isn't the same as actually defacing an article. The Honorable 16:34, 28 September 2008 (EDT)
Paintings
I prepared the category long ago when you came up with the sculptures, because I knew that there would be paintings and painters some day... The way I found Juliette Fretté is quite bizarre: I wanted to have another Juliette after writing the Juliette (bra) article, just to have a disambigation page. I then discovered that we already had her mentioned in the Playboy Playmates template for 2008, and then I saw that she's really quite unique: She wrote her thesis on feminist theories about Playmates and became one herself! :-)
As for the opera: Good idea, but: The opera itself does not specify nude scenes, so the article would have to be about the singer/actress herself. But very nice idea. I like it if we do not only have those ol' porn stars. I'm weary of seeing just another picture of those artificial people. Other genres freshen Boobpedia up I think. But that's only my opinion...
Prophecy 12:40, 29 September 2008 (EDT)
Re: Another ethical dilemma
You don't have to credit the Wikipedia article if you're not using it directly. A link to the Wikipedia article in the references or external links section might be nice, if the article is worth linking to. The Honorable 18:50, 1 October 2008 (EDT)
Anna Semenovich
Hi Dekkappai,
thanks, I'll look at it later. Prophecy 18:13, 4 October 2008 (EDT)
- Uh, there's much to think about, and different approaches to writing articles. Some of them new, but useful and better than mine, others I'll have to think about further. I'll ask you a few questions on your reasons later. Prophecy 18:50, 4 October 2008 (EDT)
- I'll post your suggestions and my thoughts on the discussion page of the article so everyone can participate. I'll start with a few and add the rest sometimes later. Prophecy 05:26, 5 October 2008 (EDT)
- Please do not delete your version in your workspace. As you might see, I'm proceeding slowly, very slowly through your suggestions and my article... The origin of her name has taken an interesting turn, by the way. Thank you for suggesting more sourcing for this section; I found that I was completely wrong about the -vich behind her name. :-) Prophecy 17:52, 13 October 2008 (EDT)
- I'll post your suggestions and my thoughts on the discussion page of the article so everyone can participate. I'll start with a few and add the rest sometimes later. Prophecy 05:26, 5 October 2008 (EDT)
Virginia Bell
I was browsing around and I found clips of an 8mm with Virginia Bell from some forum. Since you did some work on her article/filmography, thought I'd ask you. Interested? Apara 09:18, 7 October 2008 (EDT)
- Yeah I figured them out. I didn't have much trouble. Though I did forget the link to them. Apara 18:44, 7 October 2008 (EDT)
- Thanks Dekkappai. I'll be sure to save those in my favorites, so I won't forget. Apara 01:36, 8 October 2008 (EDT)
Server
Yes, I noticed it too... Don't know if this is a busy time in the US, here it's late in the evening... I did not save anything spectacular, so I don't know where it comes from... Prophecy 16:53, 7 October 2008 (EDT)
Unfortunately, we haven't, in this case. I noticed that they have an allround metatemplate on Wikipedia which you can fill with all kind of content so if would even work if you'd like to create a navigation template for all the moles on Dominno's body - but when I saw the template, I realised it was such an immense work to implement that here that I resigned for the moment... Prophecy 16:57, 14 October 2008 (EDT)
Books
Of course there will be a publication template. Some day... :-) The disadvantage I see in the magazine appearances table format is only one single: Our beloved server. We saw that the filmography entries cause it to break down, so the magazine appearances table will do the same... :-( Prophecy 16:20, 17 October 2008 (EDT)
Ahem...
Software update? I did not know anything about it until you told me... I then discovered the message on the main page. Well, the server is very slow so far... let's hope that's just the starting problems of a fast-working template-friendly era! :-) Prophecy 21:16, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, it's not really letting me look at anything besides User/User talk pages and the main page. Apara 22:07, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
image uploading fixed
as if you didn't know already :) anything else just let me know. --Hexvoodoo 20:50, 7 November 2008 (EST)
Notes
Yes, it was intentional. The Notes field was planned only for filmographies, as I saw that many people add them. Normally only for filmographies without templates, to be able to add stuff. Well, but I see that my creations grow and people find many ways to use them... But generally I think a field like Notes shouldn't be included in an infobox, as an article is the place to add notes. (And I admit I don't have the time to add this to the infobox. :-) ) Some of my late pictures and articles were corrupted due to the server update, so I'm busy repairing them... Hope you don't mind.
Regards
Prophecy 14:04, 11 November 2008 (EST)
Well...
...let's do our thing, and they do theirs... here on Boobpedia the criteria are simple: bigger than B -> include. I like that. I wouldn't feel capable of judging if a performer is notable or not with all these "soft" criteria.
Prophecy 10:20, 19 November 2008 (EST)
- Hm, Mr. Kizu could be interesting, but all I know of him is that he's sooooo strict with his copyright! That's why I kind of dislike him - He has discovered a great model, but (to be frank) I seriously doubt his skills as a photographer. He should allow this girl to work with other fine art photographers. It's such a pity...
- Prophecy 15:00, 19 November 2008 (EST)
Japan where I did not expect it
I don't know if you are interested in and familiar with Nadine Jansen, Milena Velba and their guest models - but if so, did you ever wonder why the pictorials of these (more mainstream/glamour) models often show elements of breast bondage, role play and manga? Or why there are videos of Bettie Ballhaus and Nadine Jansen walking through Tokyo?
Well, I just found out while expanding the article on Bernd Daktari Lorenz, their photographer. Now everything makes sense...
Regards
Prophecy
- Oooh! Thanks! I remember seeing a Tokyo Topless gallery with a Japanese model and his name when I collected material, but I lost the link and couldn't find it again when expanding the article. Here's the Mariko Morikawa gallery . There are guest galleries of Bettie Ballhaus, Nadine Jansen and Milena Velba on Tokyo Topless, too. It's a pleasure to work with you!
- P. S.: Ah, there's one other gallery of a certain Julia that Lorenz did: http://tokyotopless.com/model/Julia/03/ Do you know anything about her? Besides the Morikawa gallery, this is the only one credited to Tokyo Topless and not to bettie-b.de, nadine-j.de or milena-velba.de like the other ones. I could not find her name on Boobpedia. Prophecy 11:34, 20 November 2008 (EST)
- Oh, this would be cool if you started a stub... Don't forget to add
[[Category:Bernd Daktari Lorenz models]]
. :-) For Sofia Rose: Thorough work! And this is what Boobpedia needs. I only got back to my Bernd Lorenz article because I was doing something completely different: Browsing through German model databases, because some models and photographers were linked there. But then I saw a face and thought - don't I know her? It was a model who appeared on nadine-j.de long ago, I searched everywhere for her, but they gave her another name, so nothing came up. I have found two more Bernd Lorenz models in these databases, and nobody knows about it! I never thought it would be possible to keep some kind of "privacy" or "non-fame" if you once appeared on a site like nadine-j.de. I'll write the articles soon... Prophecy 17:00, 20 November 2008 (EST)
- Oh, this would be cool if you started a stub... Don't forget to add
Pin ups in Japan
Hi Dekkappai,
I've been meaning to ask you, if Japan had any pin up publications, models, etc? Since the only ones I know of are from the Western world. Apara 01:06, 24 November 2008 (EST)
- I see, could you name a couple models if you can? Apara 01:51, 24 November 2008 (EST)
- Thanks for the information, if you look at my user page and the articles I start here. You'll noticed I don't go past 1975 pin up related. Since to me, the art of it died then (which is probably why the popularity of Betty Page boosted in the 80s). So you can probably suspect my definition based on that. Apara 02:40, 24 November 2008 (EST)
Japanese categories
Hi Dekkappai,
I had several messages that day, so I did not notice that you added to my talk page too, sorry. I'll have a look at the categories. Prophecy 05:16, 25 November 2008 (EST)
- The division into "Directorname films" is good, same as in Category:Photos. I'll look at your second question. Prophecy 08:32, 25 November 2008 (EST)
- Yes, the Tokyo Topless merging is definitely wrong. It creates a monster article - and not even an article, because it will no longer be listed as an article. I did the same in the beginning with my photographer articles: Putting the article on top of the category. There are two huge disadvantages:
- First of all: The photographer page was not listed in the results when the serach box was used. Categories are not listed. So it was as if the photographers weren't there at all.
- Second: The articles became to long, and if you wanted to look for the mere category, i. e. a list of models shot by this photographer, you couldn't find them, because some articles became so long that you did not expect to find list of models at the end of it. (Cf. Katja Ehrhardt for example).
- I think the Honorable did this in good faith, but I cannot second that at all. Please leave him a message and revert the merge. Feel free to cite my opinion. Prophecy 09:30, 25 November 2008 (EST)
- Yes, the Tokyo Topless merging is definitely wrong. It creates a monster article - and not even an article, because it will no longer be listed as an article. I did the same in the beginning with my photographer articles: Putting the article on top of the category. There are two huge disadvantages:
Tokyo Topless
I was experimenting. :) I've undone the merges; hopefully I got them all. The Honorable 11:13, 27 November 2008 (EST)
BMI
Yes, a few months ago a new user who was very keen on programming introduced it. I found it too complicated too and never used it. The user has vanished too... But feel free to use it if you like! :-) Prophecy 22:42, 4 December 2008 (EST)
Naming
I say preserve the pun. :) The Honorable 18:48, 5 December 2008 (EST)
Liberty
Hi Dekkappai,
yes, of course these sculptures would qualify, I've already planned something with them. But they are not boob slips, because it was somewhat normal that at least one breast was exposed. So they belong in the "open bust" category - the category already exists and contains open bust clothes, and I'm planning to write an article on this some day. And yes, during my research for statues, I came across the American bigottery of course; it was Ashcroft. An article about this is already hidden in the references for Wardrobe malfunction: http://www.fineartregistry.com/articles/altabe_joan/artwork-nudity-letter46.php :-) Prophecy 09:48, 6 December 2008 (EST)
- Go ahead. Category:Films and videos by genre is there now. You could create subcategories like "BBW videos" and stuff. Prophecy 13:50, 7 December 2008 (EST)
database problems
yes tech performed a repair on the database. good to hear that the problem has been fixed :) --Hexvoodoo 13:50, 7 December 2008 (EST)
Amazon jp affiliate links
Alas, I think the template only works with American Amazons. :) You can continue to add it manually to Amazon JP listings if you want. The Honorable 21:51, 9 December 2008 (EST)
Chesty
When I saw her movie Deadly Weapons, she looked to be middled aged. In her later films, she does look a bit older. So the 1928 birth could be accurate and she's mostly like well into her 80s of now. I read somewhere she died in the 1980's, which is absurd and tottaly false. Her cup size doesn't seem to appear anywhere that I've look and I know she's bigger than an FF/G. So we can only go by her measurements. I've looked for info on her in the past and sort of ended up empty handed and wasn't aware of her interview with Gent. Apara 01:28, 20 December 2008 (EST)
- Seeing as you're creating a Chesty Morgan article from the ground up. I've been thinking of re-doing the Vicky Kennedy article I made earlier this year. Someone added the article from Wikipedia and I rarely touched since. Like how I re-did the article for Rosina Revelle. Apara 03:44, 25 December 2008 (EST)
- Thanks for the notes. I used a bit of it for the article on Goldfinger. I think I found all that I can find for now. Apara
- Nice work on Chesty Morgan! FYI, supposedly Busty Russell was her inspiration. Maybe you read that from the research? Apara 00:20, 31 December 2008 (EST)
- Thanks for the notes. I used a bit of it for the article on Goldfinger. I think I found all that I can find for now. Apara
Do you happen to know.....
Who this is? http://www.moodyz.com/shop/-/detail/=/cid=mia391/ Apara 05:09, 3 January 2009 (EST)
Happy New Year
Just stopped by to say how agreeable your company as a fellow editor is - now that I know others.
Prophecy 06:50, 6 January 2009 (EST)
Fuko
AV work? Uh oh ah! If only there weren't all these pixelations... I guess you as a connoisseur are already used to spot the things behind the pixels, like Superman with his X-ray eyes? Tell me your technique some day, please, so that I can enjoy Japanese pictorials and videos more... :-) Prophecy 18:38, 6 January 2009 (EST)
- Harumi: Wasn't me. :-) Prophecy 23:04, 6 January 2009 (EST)
Reference
I might have, but not on purpose. I didn't notice, sorry about that. Apara 01:28, 7 January 2009 (EST)
Sugguestion
For Momoko Okada, you could put all the info in one Biobox and label the measurements/cup size as the name she used. For example, "100cm/G metric as 'so and so'". So it won't look too messy. Apara 03:17, 13 January 2009 (EST)
- ...thanks for the input, Apara... I'd considered that too, but thought it would make things a bit confusing, since, possibly, we're going to find different bio info under each name (these bios are are probably about as "real" as the stage names are). Also, I wonder how grouping all the data into one infobox that way would affect categories like "Cup size". With the three infoboxes, it puts the article into each category (as, I think, it should). Would listing several cup sizes in one infobox cause some sort of technical foul-up? And, actually, if I write up more on the model (she does interest me enough to devote some time to building up the article :-), I think I could make a separate bio section under each name, and put the infobox into the section for each name. Perhaps that will help the article look cleaner?... Dekkappai 16:13, 13 January 2009 (EST)
- Separate bio sections would make it look cleaner. I think putting her current measurements/cup size on one biobox and putting her others under the categories. Also refer to them in that separate bio section. So when a observer reads them. It wouldn't be too confusing. So basically, Biobox of current name/stats/whatever else, then bio section of her with whatever name she used to known as, what she did, refer to her stats then, categorize them and so on. That's what I would do. But something can complicate this. I can't really think of anything that might would. Apara 20:43, 13 January 2009 (EST)
- That sounds like it might work. Actually, I merged the article into her first name... But, as I told Prophecy, I will mark this article for research-- she's a subject who has interested me in all three of her names (before I knew they were all the same person). So I'll put the information together, and then see what looks like it will work best. I'll ask from input from you and the others when it starts falling into shape. Thanks again. Dekkappai 22:30, 13 January 2009 (EST)
- Separate bio sections would make it look cleaner. I think putting her current measurements/cup size on one biobox and putting her others under the categories. Also refer to them in that separate bio section. So when a observer reads them. It wouldn't be too confusing. So basically, Biobox of current name/stats/whatever else, then bio section of her with whatever name she used to known as, what she did, refer to her stats then, categorize them and so on. That's what I would do. But something can complicate this. I can't really think of anything that might would. Apara 20:43, 13 January 2009 (EST)
Same person
Hi Dekkappai,
without having a look at the article — when I discover that measurements differ in several sources, I don't fill them in the biobox, but discuss them in a special section in the article text. That is what always should be done if sources differ. I think we can transfer this principle to your case too. I was just thinking of Linsey Dawn McKenzie who had a breast reduction and whose biobox still keeps her maximum bust size (as an homage I presume) :-). The proper way (for both your model and Linsey) would be to write a [see article] in the corresponding biobox field, with a link to the section where you mention the development (measurements, for example, is a free text field). Autometed fields like Bra size must be left empty, and the corresponding categories added manually at the bottom of the article. Prophecy 16:36, 13 January 2009 (EST)
- But it's only the measurements that change, isn't it? Having several bioboxes in one article poses the problem that bioboxes normally are put at the top of a page, with no way to change that. So you won't be able to put a biobox in a section further down an article, as far as I know... They'll be all at the top of the article. Prophecy 16:43, 13 January 2009 (EST)
- This would be a precedence and a rare exception to Boobpedia, but if you think it's necessary to make three different articles (and if you have enough stuff to make all three of them more than a stub) — go ahead. I am still in favour of one single article. Prophecy 16:50, 13 January 2009 (EST)
Please complare
Talk:Linafay Can you help me? Prophecy 16:29, 15 January 2009 (EST)
Can You Please Contact Me off of Boopedia?
I would appreciate it as I have a few things to ask you. Primarily from what I read on The Honurable's talk page and your interpretation of what was written on FUKO's wikipedia page I'm frankly saddened that you are willing to be "Boobpedia snitch." It serves no purpose to the truth in Boobs which no, you do not own a pair of, to be so nasty towards someone who really respects understands and is standing up for breasts as you seem to be. I question why, if you honor Boobs as much as you claim to, would you even mention a very important debate that occurred off this website. You seemed so amiable as well! I also have other things to ask you. Thanks signed BreastKing 20:03, 23 January 2009 (EDT)
Bettie Page
Hey Dekkappai
I was wondering if you have any interest in Bettie Page. I was thinking of rewriting the article and getting rid of the GDFL. Apara 17:56, 10 February 2009 (EST)
- Excellent! You can send them as a JPEG to my e-mail. I would ask you to send them as the PDFs, but I think my Adobe apps are screwy. Apara 17:56, 10 February 2009 (EST)
- Yeah I've been meaning to tell you, that I did. I haven't gotten around to read all of them yet. Apara 19:27, 19 February 2009 (EST)
Sofia Rose
The image limit is only for fair use images, so we don't get sued. :) If the images are directly from Sofia, you can use as many as you like.
We could certainly re-feature Sofia, now that she's been interviewed again. Our first two-time interviewee! The Honorable 18:08, 2 March 2009 (EST)
Kelly Shibari
I didn't realized that page already existed. She looked fimilar, but I couldn't put my finger on it. If noticed, I would of reverted it. Apara 18:33, 4 March 2009 (EST)
Kelly Shibari
My source is actually Kelly Shibari. She was on Instant Messenger with me at the time and verified all the information that was put into the article. I don't know exactly what to do here, is there possibly an email address I can have her write to to verify that it was her who gave me the information? - Kaobear 06:43, 5 March 2009 (EST)
- Let me go ahead and talk with ehr and i will get back to you as soon as possible. If she does say yes i would most definately appreciate any help that you could give me on the matter. - Kaobear 10:51, 5 March 2009 (EST)
- I can always ask her if she would like to do an interview with you if you like. get your own perspective on things and what not. - Kaobear 06:53, 6 March 2009 (EST)
- I have created Kelly_Shibari/Interview_With_Kelly_Shibari , could you help me source the article using that page please? Thank you for all of your help. - Kaobear 06:31, 7 March 2009 (EST)
- Thank you for all your help. - Kaobear 07:35, 8 March 2009 (EDT)
Back
Glad to know you'll be back! I couldn't answer you yesterday because the page did not load when I tried...
Regards
Prophecy
Producer template
Hi Dekkappai,
I think you should just post an image (logo) at the right top of the page like I did for articles that do not have a template like breast bondage or adhesive tape. The {{Manufacturer}} template would not work. It has some general company information, but it lacks additional fields for specific data of a film company or studio. Apart from this, I'd like to have it a different colour scheme. :-)
Apara also asked me if we should not have a publication/magazine/book template, and I have also thought of a website template. I think I should start programming again some day... :-)
Regards
Prophecy 18:39, 27 March 2009 (EDT)
Sample clips
I see no problem with linking to clips posted by an official source (producer, distributor, etc.). Link away! The Honorable 21:10, 29 March 2009 (EDT)
- There are worse things to be bombarded with... :) The Honorable 21:27, 29 March 2009 (EDT)
Template problem
Hi Dekkappai,
I experienced the same problem too. I think your way is a good solution. Another way I sometimes use then I edit other parts of an article containing a filmography: I comment the filmography out (<!-- -->) while working on the article and remove the comment tags when I finally save it. So the page loads quickly during the editing process.
Regards
Prophecy 08:04, 3 April 2009 (EDT)
Re: Older, less-busty busty series?
I think your suggestion ("Maybe just start the series articles, and not articles on the individual actresses/videos?") sounds fine. The Honorable 21:01, 14 April 2009 (EDT)
Template Lists
Do you know how to make template list, like the DanniGirls one? Cost 05:58, 7 May 2009 (EDT)
- Hi, Cost. I had not noticed this sort of list template. You can see from most of my articles-- actress articles such as Hana Uehara or list articles such as List of Cinema Unit GAS DVDs: 2009-- that I've been using the filmography templates quite a bit. I didn't know about this type of list template... I'm not sure that the articles I work on could use this format though... I'll investigate it more. Thanks for pointing this out! Dekkappai 09:24, 7 May 2009 (EDT)
- On second thought... I came across a list of the ranking of busty and BBW actresses by month and year at a particular site... maybe I could use this for that. It seems to me that the list would be better with an image of the actress though. Dekkappai 16:23, 7 May 2009 (EDT)
- I've made film templates before, and they're pretty straightforward. Penthouse Pets (which is 4.5 years out of date btw) also has a group of templates like that. See Sunny Leone for example. It seems Prophecy made the latest one, so I'll ask him. Cost 10:22, 8 May 2009 (EDT)
- On second thought... I came across a list of the ranking of busty and BBW actresses by month and year at a particular site... maybe I could use this for that. It seems to me that the list would be better with an image of the actress though. Dekkappai 16:23, 7 May 2009 (EDT)
List templates
Hi Dekkappai,
you mentioned that the list templates on the model pages offer an advantage, while you couldn't see an advantage of the list templates on the list pages. Well - there are three advantages:
- They are both one and the same template! Just have a look at {{2007_dannigirls}} for example. It's explained in the documentation. If you add nothing, it appears as a navbox, if you add style=list, it becomes a list.
- This once said, the second advantage seems obvious: Once an update is made to the template (for example when a new model in the current year is added), the change appears both on the model pages and in each and every list on Boobpedia.
- As it was sometimes difficult to decide whether a vintage playmate has a C cup or not, I left the decision to the people who would write an article on the model one day. The model name appears as normal black if there is no article yet, but if someone writes an article on the model, her name turns into a link both in every navbox and every list on Boobpedia. So this way of mentioning the models is highly future-compatible.
About the thumbs - This is a thought which I carry with me since a long time. It would be possible. Photographer templates already have a thumb: Martin Perreault It's the photo in the biobox of the article, but it's added manually to the template. So if someone changes the picture in the article, it will not be changed in the template. And this is the problem: So far, only very few editors have written articles on photographers, and the probability that someone changes a picture is neglectable. But the biobox pictures of female models are changed quite often, and unfortunately there is absolutely no way of saying: "Take the picture from the corresponding biobox" to a template. Well, there is a way: The biobox could have different styles, just like the film template has: As an infobox on a page, but only as a list entry in a list. But there is one huge disadvantage which makes it impossible to implement this feature: You already know how slow a page gets if you have 10 films in a filmography. Now imagine a page with 100 models listed on it! It would just look like a page with 100 single text lines, but actually it is a page with 100 full bioboxes, including all the huge and complex code a "normal" biobox contains - together with 33 other templates included in each and every biobox. Tried on one page, this would instantly knock Boobpedia's server out.
There is no way to "exclude" the complex code and other templates if a biobox is just displayed as a list entry. They are always there. Unfortunately. So my answer is:
No, thumbnails are not possible. :-(
Prophecy 16:54, 8 May 2009 (EDT)
Model ID request
By all means, feel free to post ID requests. :) The Honorable 20:14, 18 May 2009 (EDT)
Voluptuous Body Type Category
True, it is easy to toe the line between busty and voluptuous but I really meant for the term to describe females who are not only busty but have curves and a healthy butt. Also remember that voluptuous does not necessarily mean "big-boobed". For eg. Roselyn Sanchez is voluptuous yet she only has B-cups. The reason why I don't want to settle with just removing average and just throwing people in categories which best describe them is that I believe in accuracy. A body type should be something that helps define the women on this site. Some guys like ladies on the skinnier end and others (like me) prefer the thicker chicks. Inaccuracies will result in persons who like to come here and search through the body types of their preference possibly feeling disgruntled. Speaking of accuracy, what then do you do with ladies such as Kim Kardashian. She is clearly not "skinny" and clearly not "chubby", so where does that leave her? Average is not an accurate description.
I understand that the cateogries may be subjective but I believe this is a legit body type.
--DuanCulo 20:29, 11 August 2009 (EDT)
- Good points, Duan. Like I say though, I'm not a fan of the whole category, and usually don't use it at all. You'll have to talk to other editors to get it implemented. Regards. Dekkappai 22:14, 11 August 2009 (EDT)
Main Page activity
A good suggestion. I've changed the Main Page's discussion page so that it can be used to post suggestions for the main page. Suggest away! :) The Honorable 21:35, 22 January 2010 (EST)
would like to feature some japanese models
hi dekk,
i'd like to get some suggestions from you as to what some of your favourite japanese model articles are. i plan to put at least three on the main page in the near future, one as a featured article, and the other two in the "busty women you may not know" section. i'm sure you have some good ones in mind. thanks in advance! --Hexvoodoo 17:52, 25 August 2010 (EDT)
- thanks for the recommendations. i have put them on my to do list --Hexvoodoo 20:58, 2 September 2010 (EDT)
Deletions
Sorry about that -- I was deleting images on the [unused files list], and they were on it for some reason. I will un-delete them posthaste. The Honorable 16:37, 1 October 2010 (EDT)
Real names
We've removed real names and birth names from the biobox, and per Boobpedia:Policy, will only permit them now if the article subject has released it or doesn't mind it being known, and there's a reference. For example, Jenna Jameson gives her real name in her autobiography, so that's fine; Angelina Jolie's full birth name is widely known, so that's fine. But if the article subject doesn't want their real name publicized, then it's not allowed here.
And I had been wondering what those Japanese characters in the "real name" field were; thanks for enlightening me. :) The Honorable 17:23, 11 July 2011 (EDT)
Re: Boin "Holly James" Box / Holly James
Hey D, they are two different Holly James. The one I posted (and now there is a photo) is the Holly James I had in mind. I think she is British Iranian. Silicone Valley 21:45, 20 September 2011 (EDT)
image redirect
hi dekk, i looked into this. all recent versions of mediawiki have this problem, but there is a hack for it. i've used that fix and it should be working properly now. --Hexvoodoo 19:10, 22 September 2011 (EDT)
Hikari Hino
hmm i edited that page because it was in category:Playboy NSS models. i don't know who tagged that article with that category, but i have to add the template to every article in the category. --Hexvoodoo 00:46, 4 October 2011 (EDT)
Image size
You'll have to talk to Hexvoodoo about that; I don't think I have access to configure that. The Honorable 23:09, 21 January 2012 (EST)
Re: Welcome
Hi, Dekkappai
Thanks for the Welcome! I love japanese models and i'll try create more articles about them! Battlekenya 22 January 2012 (EST)
Only one nude picture
Athanatophobos 23 January 2012
Hello,
It's not really a rule, but I know The Honorable said that would be good if we put only one nude picture of the Boobpedia models in their pages.
So, I try to do that when I see several nude photos of the models by keeping just one of them. The pages are cleaner like that.
Sorry for my English, I'm French. I hope you understood me.
Regards.
Thanks a lot
Athanatophobos 25 January 2012
Hello,
Thanks for your congratulations. There are millions glamour models on Earth, so there is a lot of works on Boobpedia. I hope my work is good. I will keep on adding pages about these beautiful women around the world.
- Ditto. Thanks also, Dekkapai. I can see that you've put in a lot of quality work over the years. --Loose cannon 11:22, 25 January 2012 (EST)
- Well, thank you too! Dekkappai 16:05, 25 January 2012 (EST)
DMM
Hello, Dekkappai! It's really strange, because i'm able to use the DMM website and i'm from outside Japan too! (i'm from Brazil). the DMM site changed and some olds links that used for reference are not available anymore! but I've not any problemm to acess the site! I don't know how can i help you now! Battlekenya00:10, 19 April 2012 (EDT)
Re: Great Work
I did know about the lower restriction! i'm trying to put all madonna's movie. but some movies has F-Cup actress or lower. for example, Yu Kawakami is D-Cup, probably, her article and movies will be excluded, right?
Thanks for the warning! Battlekenya 12:14, 22 August 2012 (EDT)
Blog hosts
Have you looked into Tumblr? I don't know if it's quite what you're looking for, but it is free, and there's all kinds of porn on it. :) The Honorable 20:01, 1 October 2012 (EDT)
- Hi Honorable. I wasn't aware Tumblr was a blog host, but God knows I've swiped-- er, borrowed-- plenty of images from it through the years... I'll look into it! Thanks! Dekkappai 23:46, 1 October 2012 (EDT)
Hey, congratulations on making the IMDb top contributors list! The Honorable 17:02, 4 January 2013 (EST)
- Thanks, Honorable! Unfortunately I've been neglecting work here for IMDb. Most of those Pink Films I'm working on over there don't fit into Boobpedia's "notability" standards ;-) Once I'm done over there, I'll dig in here again! Happy New Year to you and all our fellow Boobpedians! Dekkappai 14:10, 7 January 2013 (EST)
I wonder?
How do I know which pictures are copyright? For example, all picture in Tia (AV idol).Manzzzz
- Hi, Manzzzz. My understanding is that they're all in copyright, and we are using them under Fair Use practice as commentary/illustration of the subject-- the actress or the video. But I wouldn't be the one to ask about this... Hexvoodoo or The Honorable can give you Boobpedia's policies on this better than I... Cheers! Dekkappai 02:56, 19 May 2013 (EDT)
JAV reviews
Sure, as long as you don't add a bunch of galleries and spam links to your reviews. :) The Honorable 15:04, 8 September 2013 (EDT)
Election of 2016
Making an unauthorized political statement by removing Ivanka Trump from my watch list... Shit... Eleanor Roosevelt had much better tits... and they were natural!... Dekkappai (talk) 22:26, 14 November 2016 (EST)