User talk:Teddy

Boobpedia - Encyclopedia of big boobs
Jump to: navigation, search

(TopHeavy Amateurs)

Hi, Teddy if you can wood you add the pics Lydia and Chantet of TopHeavy Amateurs i have add but have no pics & Bra Size's Thank you


Score models

cheers for putting up the score models i requested--titman86 03:08, 7 February 2009 (EST)

Films & Videos

Hi, Teddy-- thanks for the new video articles. Good to see someone else adding some of these. When I add these I use the "New film" template feature (Type "New film" into the search window, and it comes up.) That creates a template you can use to start the film article, and then also easily add as a filmography entry for articles on actresses, directors, companies, series, etc. Feel free to do that, or ask me how-- it's a little tricky-- if you want. Or keep using the "infobox film" if you prefer, either way your work is appreciated. Cheers! Dekkappai 10:51, 2 March 2009 (EST)

Image:Julie Graham2.jpg

I've asked to remove it because everyone can go to Google Images or IMDb and find her portrait in 2 seconds. This site is meant for other (sometimes rare) types of images. -Thefixer 07:43, 5 May 2009 (EDT)

I included both images as her appearance in Image:Julie Graham.jpg is unrecognisable from her usual appearance. Readers wouldn't realise who this actress is just from that image. Teddy 08:30, 5 May 2009 (EDT)

Thank you!

You are one of the most, if not the most important current contributer to this encyclopedia, and for that, I just wanted to thank you!

You must be spending a lot of time here! :P How much? Anyway, thanks again for the great stuff! --Jeremfg 22:19, 8 July 2009 (EDT)

Voluptuous Body Type Category

True, it is easy to toe the line between busty and voluptuous but I really meant for the term to describe females who are not only busty but have curves and a healthy butt. Also remember that voluptuous does not necessarily mean "big-boobed". For eg. Roselyn Sanchez is voluptuous yet she only has B-cups. The reason why I don't want to settle with just removing average and just throwing people in categories which best describe them is that I believe in accuracy. A body type should be something that helps define the women on this site. Some guys like ladies on the skinnier end and others (like me) prefer the thicker chicks. Inaccuracies will result in persons who like to come here and search through the body types of their preference possibly feeling disgruntled. Finally on your point of throwing people into categories, what then do you do with ladies such as Kim Kardashian. She is clearly not "skinny" and clearly not "chubby", so where does that leave her?

NB: If you see a full-body picture of Claire Dames you will see that she has a big ass and nice curves. My definition of "skinny" is slim all-over not just thin in one area.

--DuanCulo 20:20, 11 August 2009 (EDT)

  • I would class Kim Kardashian as "slim". Maybe we could have a category called "large ass" that could be used in conjuction with the other body type categories. Teddy 03:55, 12 August 2009 (EDT)

Basic info

Please supply topless=yes for your additions in which it applies. Keep in mind blank equals no (or at least unknown). So if you supply an image that proves the answer is yes, please also write it down. Also, please supply categories like pierced nipples when the image proves so. Thanks! -Thefixer

  • I don't really see the point of adding topless=yes when the photo shows they've been topless. I'll try to remember to add the pierced nipples categories though. Teddy 04:14, 13 August 2009 (EDT)
Images sometimes get deleted. It's also good for searches. And maybe somewhere in the future topless=yes would be a category. -Thefixer 05:06, 13 August 2009 (EDT)

Skye Blue

Hello, I was wondering why you removed two pictures from the Skye Blue article?--Mortye 21:40, 1 June 2011 (EDT)

Hi. They were removed for copyright reasons. Boobpedia's guidelines state:
... a short article should only have one fair use image in the biographical table (Biobox). Only long articles can have more than one fair use images, and only for illustrating appropriate text in the article when licensed images are unavailable.
The two images removed from Skye Blue didn't provide readers with any extra information, so were an unnecessary use of copyrighted material, and therefore not "fair use". If an image showed her before breast surgery, for example, that may qualify as fair use. Teddy 06:29, 2 June 2011 (EDT)

Thanks / Images

Hi Teddy, I just thought I'd echo Jeremfg's comments above. Whenever I look at the Recent Changes, I see a constant stream of new articles being added by you. You really are the most prolific contributor to the Boobpedia project. If I didn't know any better, I'd assume you were some sort of highly advanced bot but your comments on this page and others means you've passed the Turing Test. :) I also really like your List of British porn stars which is a great resource for those of us who are fans of busty British babes.

I just thought I'd let you know that I reinstated some of the images that you recently removed (that came up in my watchlist). Like you, I don't like to see too many fair use images in an articles but I wouldn't be as hardline as yourself. In some cases I reinstated an image because it showed a different aspect of the model (e.g. hair colour, appearance, activity) and in others, I retained an image because it was added by one of the original contributors to the article (I personally like to retain images added by editors who otherwise contribute more content to Boobpedia than simply adding images). I hope that's OK with you.

Keep up the good work, Loose cannon 17:06, 2 June 2011 (EDT)

Feel free to revert any of my removals. It's not worth having a conflict over it. Teddy 17:32, 2 June 2011 (EDT)

COPYRIGHT AND IDENTITY FRAUD!!!

I have no clue who your are but you are NOT the Teddy you are pretending to be. You posted an image of me on here which you have no right or copyright to do so. You even put in my wrong details ie I DO NOT have enhanced breasts! I don't know what the hell you think your doing but you can be sued for this! Stop stealing my images and a respectable photographers identity!!!

COPYRIGHT AND IDENTITY FRAUD!!!

I have no clue who your are but you are NOT the Teddy you are pretending to be. You posted an image of me on here which you have no right or copyright to do so. You even put in my wrong details ie I DO NOT have enhanced breasts! I don't know what the hell you think your doing but you can be sued for this! Stop stealing my images and a respectable photographers identity!!!

Contact

Can you email me? I need to discuss something privately. Thanks. The Honorable 17:18, 23 June 2011 (EDT)

The email address I have for you doesn't seem to work -- can you email me through the link above? Thanks. The Honorable 10:54, 2 June 2012 (EDT)

Danielle Robinson and Danielle Richardson are two different models ?

Athanatophobos


Hello, I don't understand about Danielle Robinson and Danielle Richardson.

Cbz told me they are the same models and I merge their pages. But, you recreate the page of Danielle Robinson.

What's going on ?

Regards.

a mistake ?

Athanatophobos May 17th, 2012

Hello,

I saw your page about Kirsty Corner and the freeones links, and it seems the woman in the photo isn't her.

The model is blonde and the woman in the photo has got brown hair :

Regards.

I'm sure it's her. She's just dyed her hair. Teddy 08:01, 17 May 2012 (EDT)

Caroline Pierce

Can we add Caroline Pierce to the website? I read she has only a B cup size breast--Midosa21 05:51, 18 May 2012 (EDT) Midosa21 Friday,May 18, 2012

I'm afraid the site only includes women who are at least a C cup. See Boobpedia:FAQ. Teddy 06:18, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

Porchia Watson

this page should redirect to Watson also http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Porchia cbz

Masha Lund

Nice match with this model and CGOW Masha Christensen. I made a page for her Cyber Club links with both names http://playboyplus.wikispaces.com/Masha+Christensen

Is there a way to look at all redirect pages on boobpedia so I can see if I need to combine any other pages like the example above? I know a lot of girls that use an alias in Playboy and if I could see a list of redirect pages, there may be more I was unaware of. thanks cbz

There's a list of redirects in date order here, or you can find them alphabetically by looking at the italicised titles in this list of all pages. Or you can search for all pages that contain #redirect. Teddy 18:45, 18 May 2012 (EDT)

Hayley Rivers

huge doubts that Playboy model Hayley Rivers is the porn star you connected with the IFAD link. they don't look alike. 4 inch height difference. and the porn star who retired in 2008 wouldnt be in a PLayboy SE mag in 2009 cbz

You rock!

Just saw all the stars you added from Plumper Pass! Thanks for all the work--titman86 15:42, 25 June 2012 (EDT)

Kat (model)

Hey Teddy, I am very interested in the model Kat (Katerina, BabyStar, Starbaby)http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Kat_%28model%29 , if you have information about its date of birth or current activities?

Lil Laura

Hey mate, nice work on all your submissions! Do you have any more of Lil Laura http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Lil_Laura ? Seems like her modelmayhem account is gone now.

Karina Hart

1) Could you stop deleting photos on Karina Hart article? 2) Why do you cancel of my uploads. Primary politeness is to tell me why, if you have a problem with me. thank you Super0stylo

On the image upload page it clearly states "Do not overwrite an existing image with a completely different image" and "Fair use images are subject to usage restrictions.". Teddy 18:26, 23 July 2012 (EDT)
So If I understand well you have fair right for these files: Toni Lynn, Siri, Sierra Sanders, Jasmine Jae, Sinthia Fix.
If yes I am interrested to know how you proceed(sic). Super0stylo

One week ago I asked you something, could you answer Please. Super0stylo

I don't understand your question. Teddy 19:50, 1 August 2012 (EDT)

Ewa Sonnet

No need to delete the photos from the Ewa Sonnet page -- since Boobpedia is a Busty.pl affiliate, we can use the photos. The Honorable 07:46, 2 August 2012 (EDT)

So can we use any image from Busty.pl? Shouldn't these images be tagged with Template:Media licensed instead of Template:Fair use? Teddy 08:01, 2 August 2012 (EDT)

Kim Eternity

hi!!

I suggest merging Kim Hines and Kin Eternity's profiles into on profile under the name Kim Eternity since it was the name she goes by now 11 October 2012

Midosa21

Destiny Day

would you please redirect Destiny (Big Naturals) to Destiny Day's profile, for they are one and the same actors. And if possible you can keep the image in Destiny (Big Naturals) in Destiny Day's profile and place it somewhere in the article.

Thanks Midosa21 12 October 2012

I can't keep both images as we're not allowed to use copyrighted images unnecessarily. Teddy 07:59, 12 October 2012 (EDT)

Melodee Bliss

http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Melodee_Bliss

Someone keeps vandalizing her page. Anyway we can lock it so only respected contributors (people who have been around a while) can edit it?

request

please I request deletion of the article that I added to this website:

Karin (Colombian pornstar), Ms.Marshae, Tootsie, Georgia Brown, Decollector, Charlie Dimmock.

If possible

midosa21 2013/1


Stina lynn, i was wondering if there were anymore photos of her? her modelmayhem is gone i believe. my username is BrianF25 thanks.

Dealing with Spam

Instead of blanking spam pages, use the {{delete|spam}} tag to mark it, and let the admins delete it. --G051051 12:24, 7 July 2014 (EDT)

Image licenses

Athanatophobos December 15th 2014

Thanks so much, I didn't know about this "fair" option.

Regards.

Image licenses

Thank you for the reminder, I'll try to select the correct license in my next uploads T-Mac 22:04, 22 January 2015 (EST)

Brooke Hogan

[Changed Photo] Do you think dressed Brooke Hogan photo really better than her photo in a bikini?

Her face was hidden in the bikini photo. I've now added a different bikini photo without her wearing sunglasses. Teddy 06:54, 23 January 2015 (EST)

Glamour models

Hi! :) On your proposal: May be the new "non-topless" category will be mostly for richest mainstream movie stars who can use body doubles for nude scenes in their movies. :) And definitely no glamour or fashion models in it—partial nudity (or partially shown full nudity) is core part of modern advertising and show business. But it will be nice take a look on the "non-topless" list (list of glamour models with anti-glamour taboos). :) —nonduc 05:50, 2 March 2015 (EST)

I didn't understand much of that, but I hope it means you won't be reverting my changes. Teddy 20:10, 2 March 2015 (EST)

Alexandra van Zeelandt

Athanatophobos March 5th, 2015

Hello,

Thanks for your great work. I don't understand one thing : when you saw something was weird about Alexandra's page, why didn't you fix that?

Hi. I was too busy sorting out the categories to notice the picture. Teddy 06:42, 5 March 2015 (EST)

Jennifer Korbin

Hello,

When you saw there is a mistake in Jennifer Korbin's page, why didn't you fix it?

Regards.

Maria Luisa Gil

Athanatophobos March 17th, 2015

Hello,

When you saw Maria Luisa Gil has two different pages, why didn't you merge them? Are you a bot?

Regards.

I'm not a bot, but because there are so many categories that need changing I'm having to edit in a way that I can't notice other errors. Teddy 21:46, 17 March 2015 (EDT)

Root category

Hi! :) Lets talk on content of Root Category at Boobpedia. Administrator Hexvoodoo wrote: “my rationale is that physical description categories should be left at the top level (for example: cup size, natural or fake, ethnicity, hair color, body type, height), and that's why i tolerate the huge number of cup size categories at the top. i do try to move the less important stuff into subcategories.” In my opinion it’s not rational to put physical description categories on bottom level of categories tree, but Hexvoodoo is a master and his rationality is indisputable… I just “do try to move the less important stuff on appropriate top levels.” :) —nonduc 14:03, 18 March 2015 (EDT)

The example in Boobpedia help in section “Categories” is just wrong and misleading. Position of D cup on categories tree is totally identical to position of Japanese: both have parent categories — “Category:By cup size” for “Category:D cup” and “Category:Nationality” for “Category:Japanese” and both parents are chained (not directly linked! but chained!) to Root Category. The only difference was made by voluntary decision of Hexvoodoo, i.e. to link directly some top categories (so called physical descriptions) to very bottom of categories tree. BTW, “Actresses” and “Models” are not and that’s why they must be cleaned from root level.
(About images usage. I do not use images. I do use previews, linked to images. Look at user page of Prophecy. It exists many years and no harms to anybody.) —nonduc 08:48, 19 March 2015 (EDT)
I don't know why you keep talking about physical descriptions when the rationale applies to any important category. There are 136 different nationality categories but only 64 cup size categories and, so nationalities were probably being kept out of the top level to prevent overcrowding. Teddy 10:03, 19 March 2015 (EDT)
You have not definition of “any important category”, have you? But I have declaration made by Hexvoodoo. Hexvoodoo mentioned only physical descriptions and not mentioned “any important category” includung actresses or transsexuals for instance. —nonduc 19:05, 19 March 2015 (EDT)
So if a casual reader wanted to browse a list of busty actresses, you want them to have to click through Browse categories > Category:Contents > Category:Articles > Category:People > Category:Performers > Category:Performers by occupation > Category:Actresses. If so, you shouldn't be editing here. Teddy 06:27, 20 March 2015 (EDT)
No one in sane state of mind will try this way of browsing! Your supposition is wild. :) Every causal reader can to open a personal page of any actress and to use link to category “Actresses” in first sentence of the article or to go to the end of page and to use the same link. Or he will use search with word “actresses” — it’s even easier. And that’s all. Browsing of categories tree is for those readers who want to explore the structure of the site (it’s messy for now btw). Casual reader usually browses categories from top level categories to parent ones: from Category:Actresses to Category:Performers by occupation. Or he browses from category to sub-category: from Category:Adult models to Category:Met-Art models. —nonduc 09:11, 20 March 2015 (EDT)
You're creating the worst of both worlds. You will never get the logical category tree you want, unless you go against Hexvoodoo and remove the cup sizes, and readers are being made worse off with important categories harder to find. Teddy 16:23, 20 March 2015 (EDT)
Was my editing work on clearing and clarifying of list categories so bad? :D Nope, it wasn’t. So all will be right with other, trust me and don’t be whiny! :D Links to a large bunch of important categories are on every perfomer page on Boobpedia. Check them now and stop complaining! :) —nonduc 00:56, 21 March 2015 (EDT)

Too many modifications

Can I say I don't care about categories, lol? Teddy when I see all your adds (sometimes you just change one letter!), I have a headache. Sometimes; I can't see my Watchlist anymore because there are too many modifications. :'(

Often, you don't notice a model has two different pages and I have to follow all your work. :'(

Tired Athanatophobos

If you set the 'Watchlist options' to show the last 1 day of changes, you should be able to see the rest of your watchlist. You are free to browse through categories yourself to find duplicated articles; you don't have to wait for me to edit them first :). Teddy 06:52, 20 March 2015 (EDT)

.

Happy New Year! :) I’m deeply sorry for my bad conversation skills! With best regards and best wishes, —nonduc 17:11, 31 December 2015 (EST)

File:Katerina_Hartlova.jpg

Do you know where you got File:Katerina_Hartlova.jpg from? Someone emailed me asking where they could get a higher-definition version of it. The Honorable (talk) 05:37, 18 November 2016 (EST)

It was probably from http://www.imagefap.com/photo/1780001860/?pgid=&gid=5537956&page=0&idx=15 Teddy (talk) 11:56, 18 November 2016 (EST)