User talk:Bluesman2383
Thanks for flagging that spam page. If you come across any spam pages in the future, just replace their text with {{Delete}} and they'll be deleted. The Honorable 07:04, 9 August 2014 (EDT)
List of Penthouse Pets
Hello, thanks for your contribution.
It's better to keep all the brackets although these models have less than a C cup and I say why : - we can't know if the brakets are missing or the model has less than C cup. - if a model has a breast augmentation, we know we have her link.
Athanatophobos January 16th 2017, 7:00 CEST
Layla Sin
You can change the direct to an article, and add something like this to the top of the page:
: ''"Layla Sin" is also an alias for [[Tasha Reign]].''
The Honorable (talk) 21:09, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
Reply
I've replied to your comments. The Honorable (talk) 18:43, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Filmographies
Hi. Why do you consider a Filmography list "superfluous text"?
Blade Stevens (talk) 20:10 CST - 3 November 2024
Listing 100 different movies by an actress takes up a bunch of space - there are literally databases that we link up to here where you can find that. As far as I know, the owners of this site make little to no $ off all of that - and it does nothing to further a biography of anyone. Most wikis don't do that either - they create the external link to those databases. The focus here, I thought, was compiling links, categories, and a basic biography of a performer. The mods can correct me if I'm wrong. I've been here for over 10 years now and the only filmographies that got added were the ones that had a film story created. These lengthy filmographies were only added by a few newer users within the last 2 years.
Bluesman23838 (talk) 13:14 CST - 4 November 2024
I understand your point of view, but more content and keywords on the page will maximize the reach on search engines and ultimately drive more traffic. Most of the info on the site can be found elsewhere, and as an aggregated source, the goal should be to become the first place people may go for info (vs Indexxx, for example). Interviews and Wikipedia snippets can be found elsewhere, but are used to enhance the info on the pages. Also, the site's formatted film section isn't updated often and likely makes no $ for the owners, so relying solely on those entries presents incomplete information. All that said, this would be a good question for an administrator, but I'm not even sure there's anyone moderating the site anymore.
Blade Stevens (talk) 16:30 CST 5 November 2024
Removal of "If you like..."
Your recent removal of the "If you like..." sections, IMHO, lowers the value of Boobpedia. I use those links to find other models that I might like and would be willing to bet that others do to. The more useful this site is for research (and thus keeping users spending time here), the better. I don't know who, if anyone, told you to start removing that section. If you continue, I know that I will use Boobpedia less frequently and I will use another site more since the value here will be lowered. Just my .02 cents. Thanks for your consideration in this matter. BlueMax (talk) 14:35, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
