Template talk:Biobox new

Quick IMDb search

Here's a quick way to see if someone is on IMDb - just copy and paste this to a new window:

http://www.imdb.com/find?s=nm&q=FIRSTNAME+LASTNAME

(of course, don't forget to replace FIRSTNAME and LASTNAME)

If you get results, be sure to confirm it's actually the right person. If it is, supply the ID to the infobox.
-Biguns 14:21, 15 February 2008 (EST)

windows users can get free software called tweak UI from microsoft. it's possible to define custom searches there so that i just type "im SearchTerm" in my address bar and it performs an IMDB search.--Hexvoodoo 20:13, 20 February 2008 (EST)

What about creating a search form with a text-entry box and button to automate this for us, i.e. similar to the site search box or the user login form?--Effcup 07:09, 30 April 2012 (EDT)

Standard Boobpedia bra size ("E" vs. "DD")

I'd like to hear your opinions about the bra/cup size field in the new biobox.

The problem was: Models often give their bra size as 34DD which is actually a 34E. That makes it diificult to sort or search the models by bra size. It has already been discussed if Boobpedia should introduce something like a "standard Boobpedia bra size" (can't find the discussion right now). This was given up because of several reasons.

The new biobox now offers the possibility to solve that problem:

It has a new field: bra/cup size. Here's what you can do with it:

You can enter just DD like before.
Result: Bra/cup size: E (same as DD cup) . Category "DD cup" is added to the page.
You can enter the whole bra size using the Bra template:
{{bra|34|DD}} gives Bra/cup size: 34E (75E) (same as DD cup) . Category "DD cup" is added to the page.

As you see, the original cup size (DD) given by the model is preserved and added as a category to the page. No information is lost.

But the new biobox could also add a second cup size category:

It could add a simple "E cup" to the page which would result in the page being listed under both "E cup" and "DD cup". This could be confusing.
It could name the second category in a way that marks it as something .like a "standard Boobpedia cup size" which can be clearly defined on the responding category page.
- People who just love their DDDs and GGs could browse the "normal" cup size categories like before.
- People who are interested in more comparable standardised cup sizes could browse the "standard Boobpedia cup size" categories.

So:

What do you think?
How should this category be named? The name shouldn't be too long, perhaps "E cup (Boobpedia standard)". This makes a clear difference to the "normal" cup size in the category list at the bottom of an article.

Regards

Prophecy 07:23, 30 May 2008 (EDT)

Well, I want to say something about the presentation of these elements. I think most people who look at the infobox look for the cup size and not the bra size. But right now it's actually easy to find the bra size and hard to find the cup size ("Original: X"). I think it should be vice versa like in the old infobox. -Biguns 10:59, 1 June 2008 (EDT)

Thanks for your feedback. But the cup size is always there. It's always the letter behind the band size. If a model says she has GG, her cup size is actually H. It's just that the template does not neglect the fictional given cup size too (and GG is fictional, mostly invented by guys at Big Tits Round Asses and such). I saw a few Boobpedia editors changing measurements like DDD to F. The bra size template prevents this. It converts DDD to F, but leaves the DDD intact (and gives a category only for DDD so far). The question is if it should add a category for F too. Marked as "Boobpedia standard" or something like that. Vanessa Montagne put it in nice words: Above all, dancers do that: They make their cup sizes more impressive by making them double or triple. All serious measurement tables say that DDD is F. Prophecy 14:57, 1 June 2008 (EDT)

More types of Performances

Please add these types - I'd do it myself but I'm afraid to break the complicated code (read: the long IF statements):

solofingering
lesbianfingering
fingering
fingeringmen
handjobmen

Keep in mind fingering is softcore compared to fisting, so they're really two different things. -Biguns 10:54, 1 June 2008 (EDT)

I have a different opinion. Among many editors there was confusion about what "hardcore" meant. Sometimes they added: Hardcore: Only with women or something like that. But hardcore was meant only as vaginal penetration. There was no field for that, therefore I split the fields up into four clear categories:

Shown: Everything the model shows, without any sexual acts. All the fields were there already, but mixed up with the others. "bush" was not clear. Sometimes a model that happened to have her (closed) pussy shown was tagged with "bush", but some etidors meant "pink" by bush. So I added "pink".

Solo: Solo meant masturbation all the time, but it was not clear. So the Solo section means all sexual acts only done with oneself. "solofingering" clearly falls under this category, which means that it is already there. But you are right, the explanation wasn't clear enough, I added a "fingering herself" to the documentation page for solo.

Lesbian: Any sexual acts between women. As "lesbian" was already there, it now shows "Softcore" which makes it more clear. If there was penetration, lesbian fingering is contained in softcore. If there were dildos, lesbiandildo is there. It's not the question if something is considered hardcore or not, but only: Sexual acts between women.

Boy/girl: Any sexual acts between women and men. Hardcore always meant "Vaginal penetration". If not, there wouldn't have been a field named "anal". This was not clear to many editors, so now it clearly shows Boy/girl: Vaginal or Boy/girl: Anal. You are right, there is no field for "fingering with a man" or "Softcore with men", but I think that would become to fine a differentiation. As for handjob, I don't know. Is this an important category?

I only tried to preserve the old fields so that no data is lost or now appears under a false category. The rest was to categorise it and add fields in the other sections if there weren't any. Prophecy 15:15, 1 June 2008 (EDT)

P. S.: "I'd do it myself but I'm afraid to break the complicated code (read: the long IF statements)" That's why the template got a sandbox. You can experiment with the code there without changing the original code and try it out with various examples in the testcases. As the original template will be protected, the sandbox will be the only way to experiment anyway. I thought it was a good idea to import this principle from wikipedia. Every time a template has a sandbox or testcases, it is shown at the top of the page (like for {{Biobox new}}. Feel free to try things out there, but be aware that other users can experiment there too and overwrite your code. Prophecy 15:32, 1 June 2008 (EDT)

You're right about self fingering being the very definition of female masturbation, but why does lesbianfisting deserve its own category whereas lesbianfingering does not? As for handjobs given to men, I guess it's as good as any category, especially if that's the most she has done on films.

Also, I think you're wrong about the defition of hardcore. I think it should stand for "visual organs". Otherwise it would be the same solo/anal=yes for a PG-13 sex comedy and something more adult oriented. -Biguns 20:25, 1 June 2008 (EDT)

selffingering: consensus

lesbianfisting/lesbianfingering: lesbianfingering is softcore and included in "lesbian". I could not introduce another parameter, because lesbian is used on so many pages which would become wrong. But on all of these pages "lesbian" was generally used as minimum = softcore. If someone finds now that a model has done more than softcore, he can add "lesbiandildo" and "lesbianfisting". The idea of adding fisting was just mine, as it is somewhat harder than all other stuff and a reader can clearly see if the model is more "mainstream" or extreme. As there is a distinction between the "lesbian" and "boy/girl" sections now, I had to add the category to both of them.

handjob: I see your point, but I'd like to hear other opinions on this. If a majority thinks handjob is worth being included, I'll do it.

hardcore: I'm just following the most frequent use of this field on Boobpedia and on other sites like forums: "Has she done hardcore?" The most frequent question, and they always mean "Is she being fucked by a man in some scene?". Same reason as for lesbian: I could not introduce another parameter and let this one become deprecated because it was already used on so many pages. I agree that lesbian fisting is hardcore too, but i had to make a choice. If you look at a new biobox added to an existing page now, "Boy/girl: Vaginal" is always right, because the reader thought exactly of this.

"Lesbian" and "Hardcore" were (re-)defined this way, because it is the minimum consensus and does not turn any existing page wrong. Like I said: If there's more the model has done, it can always be added afterwards. But the new biobox does not show something the model has not done. Prophecy 20:51, 1 June 2008 (EDT)

Here are three more type suggetions:

blowjobfromman = currently she can only give one
blowjobfromwoman = currently such a thing can only be put as lesbian=yes (which displays as softcore)
blowjobtowoman = currently such a thing can only be put as lesbian=yes (which displays as softcore) -Biguns 06:31, 12 August 2008 (EDT)

Pink

Wikitionary defines "pink" as nothing more than a slang word for a vulva. What did you mean by spread? Just zoomed up very close or what? -Biguns 20:34, 1 June 2008 (EDT)

No, it's an abbreviation for "pink shot": lips spread by fingers. For models and photographers, "pink shot" is clearly defined like this. A nude shot is pussy without fingers, not spread, a pink shot is pussy exposed and opened/spread by fingers. I wrote this on the documentation page for the parameter "pink": Has she done "pink" shots, i. e. shown spread labia? Prophecy 20:54, 1 June 2008 (EDT)

So please add "by fingers" there too. -Biguns 09:32, 2 June 2008 (EDT)

Done. Prophecy 03:31, 3 June 2008 (EDT)

Is it trully only by her own fingers (i.e. masturbation)? -Biguns 05:39, 4 June 2008 (EDT)

Maturbation means if she rubs her clit or whatever else... -> solo. Pink shots are really only spread pussies displayed. The typical solo model shoots where she doesn't just sit there, but shows what she's got - you see the inside of her lips, because she spreads them with her fingers -> pink. Prophecy 07:04, 4 June 2008 (EDT)

News site

Hi, Prophecy. Fuko has just started an official news site at http://fuko.tv/ . Not sure what to label it in the template... I'm calling it "Homepage" for now, though the blog site is really her homepage. Dekkappai 13:30, 4 June 2008 (EDT)

Why not... It's named "official site", so it's ok to enter it there. She can have an official blog and an official site. :-) If you find that it is somewhat inappropriate to have the link listed as "Official homepage", you can move it to "External links", but I'm sure that other editors will move it back to the homepage field again as it is named "official site. Prophecy 16:43, 4 June 2008 (EDT)

I guess I just got used to thinking of her blog as the official site. If Fuko-chan says this is her official site now... I'm not one to argue with a lady! Dekkappai 18:14, 4 June 2008 (EDT)

As we are talking about links to her websites - this might be of interest for you: I wrote a Google translation template. As many of your links lead to Japanese sites, you could add a link to an (automatic) Google translation if you want. {{Google translation}} does this for you. Example for Fuko:

{{google translation | http://fuko.tv | ja}}

gives

Google translation.

Please note that this template cannot be used for the homepage parameter in the biobox, as a normal link with http:// is expected. But you could use it in the External links sections of your pages. That's what I often do with websites of models that are not written in English: Provide the "normal" link in the Biobox and add the link plus Google translation in the External links section. I've even implemented it in {{Cite web}} and the other Citation templates now:

{{cite web | title=Fuko's website | url=http://fuko.tv | accessdate=2008-06-04| language=Japanese | google=ja}}

gives

Fuko's website (Japanese). Retrieved on 2008-06-04. (Google translation).

So you can easily use it in your references, too, without having to add the {{Google translation}} template at all. See documentations of {{Cite web}} and {{Google translation}} for further details.

Regards

Prophecy 08:51, 5 June 2008 (EDT)

What about Facebook?

Is there any way please to insert into the template a facebook link? --Oren neu dag 20:16, 9 April 2009 (EDT)

I was about to make the very same suggestion as I just added Gianna Michael's (official) Facebook page as an External Link. --Loose cannon 20:00, 24 January 2010 (EST)

I see it's actually been added to the Biobox template already. --Loose cannon 08:45, 20 February 2010 (EST)

Displaying the age without the detailed known birthdate

Sometimes there is a birth year but no month and day, so there is no age displayed. Could the biobox be modified to display an age althoug there is only a birth year? Then it would be displayed to possible ages. For example: the year of birth: 1986 would display (age 25 or 26). What about that? --Lichter 08:02, 30 November 2012 (EST)

That's a good idea. Though I don't know that I'm expert enough with templates to squeeze that in... :) The Honorable 07:26, 1 December 2012 (EST)

Nipples and areolas colour/shape

As I presented to the admin The Honorable, i think will be useful introducing in our template biobox some informations about the colour and the shape of nipples and areolas on tits of girls on boobpedia. For exemple it will be interesting focusing the shape of a nipple (little/medium/big) based on the dimensions of the breast and the same thing will be done on areolas, that can be littles, mediums or bigs depending not only from the form of the boobs but also on race, etc. The colour of nipple and areola will be also useful 'cause is very different not only in different races, but is useful to denote particularities as asian girls with pale skin and dark areola and nipple or blondes that are normally pale skinned and pale nipple. Redheads normally have a pale skin and pink nipple/areola so four categories can be displayed: pink, pale, brown, dark. All those informations may be referenced 'cause sometimes there is no picture in each voice created but an author can make quotation of nipple and areolas shape/colour if is known. What about that? --Liutprando 05:27, 30 April 2013 (EDT)

Tumblr

By any chance, can we get a Tumblr option added under the "Personal pages" category? It would be a better option than currently having to add tumblr links under the external link section. Googleuser 18:11, 5 July 2012 (EDT)

Agreed. Tumblr is used enough to warrant adding an option. --DMessr82 10:41, 10 November 2013 (EST)

Purestorm

In the same way we've got a ModelMayhem option, how about adding an option for Purestorm to the Biobox? It'd hopefully keep things consistent. --DMessr82 10:44, 10 November 2013 (EST)

Creampie

With the sexual acts the pornstars do, why not add a creampie filter seeing that DP and fisting are there too?--DMessr82 10:44, 10 November 2013 (EST)

Updates

I've created a test version of the biobox with the requested Tumblr, Purestorm, and creampie updates; please test it out and let me know if everything works ok befure I update the actual template: Template:Biobox_new/test The Honorable 22:24, 12 November 2013 (EST)

Reduced breasts?

There are a number of women listed here who, despite having had breast reductions, still have big boobs. However, the only two options on the Biobox for breast type are "Natural" and "Enhanced". Could we get a "reduced" option added as well? daddy 13:15, 11 December 2013 (EST)

PurplePort

Could PurplePort be implemented into the Biobox as well? A few models have migrated over there from Purestorm.--DMessr82 06:26, 16 February 2014 (EST)

If it becomes more widely used, sure. The Honorable 15:33, 16 February 2014 (EST)

Ticklishness

I personally really like tickling and I think that in Biobox should be put in the category called ticklish ,ticklishness or ticklish rate, which would inform how much girl is ticklish. It could also be introduced category called "sensitivity". IOr both of them. But no matter what names would have this category, it would comprise a note about how ticklish and sensitive is this girl.

Nationality

Since I find the formatting of the current "nationality" field a bit uncomfortable (like, I suppose, nationality=[[{{{1}}}]]), I'd propose formatting it like ethnicity field, i.e. nationality=[[:Category:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]]. What do you think? --NOYDB (talk | edits)

Social links should be secured

Social links (Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, etc.) should use https and not http, otherwise they just redirect. -Biguns (talk) 15:39, 8 December 2017 (EST)

Adultwork

Many UK based models have a profile on Adultwork (be it for webcamming, escorting or distributing photos/videos). For example:

http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Jasmine_James -> http://www.adultwork.com/1307493

http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Sophie_Anderson -> http://www.adultwork.com/4111497

http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Georgina_Gee -> http://www.adultwork.com/4717565

http://www.boobpedia.com/boobs/Tommie_Jo -> http://www.adultwork.com/3673003

It would be nice if the Biobox Personal Pages section could have an adultwork option, to add the adultwork ID and have the appropriate link generated.

Editing the biobox is a bit complicated, but in the meantime there is a Adultwork template you can add to the external links section. The Honorable (talk) 17:28, 30 October 2018 (EDT)

Tattoos

There are quite a few pornstars who have tattoos and having a y/n item in the Biobox would help here, pulling in the tattoos category as well. Any details about the tattoos can be left for the article's body. Kansas (talk) 23:20, 20 April 2020 (EDT)

I've added this to a copy of the biobiox under my user profile: User:Kansas/Template:Biobox Compare the first and latest revisions to see the final changes and offer feedback. Here's an example of what it looks like, using Wynona Gibbs as the guinea pig page:

Kansas (talk) 15:55, 17 May 2020 (EDT)

Playboy Playmates

The base link to Playboy Playmates no longer work and need updating.--Rememberer (talk) 23:16, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Instagram

What about the Instagram logo? See Template:Instagram -- Polluks (talk) 11:56, 5 June 2023 (UTC)

The instagram links are also broken. [[File:Web icon.png|16px|link=alt=Instagram]] there's a missing | before alt. - Slupper (talk) 09:43, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Fixed. The Honorable (talk) 13:54, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Why not LinkedIn?

The infobox already has so many social network links, why not LinkedIn which is officially associated with the person as it can get? -Biguns (talk) 21:09, 12 January 2025 (UTC)

I can't imagine that it would be used much. The Honorable 22:45, 12 January 2025 (UTC)