Talk:Denise Milani

Boobpedia - Encyclopedia of big boobs
Jump to navigationJump to search

Real or fake?

hard to belive Milanis boobs are natural. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Musterman1944 (talkcontribs) 31 December 2007. To sign talk pages, add ~~~~ after your comments.

i agree with previous comment. very very hard to believe.
- they are way too big for her slim shape
- she make business with her boobs but never want to show them... why? maybe because she doesn't want that people see the scar of her surgery
- THE big thing that make me think they are fake: they are a lot of pictures in which she wears no bra and only tight or large shirts, in theses pics you can see that her boobs still have a perfectly round shape... there is no magic in this: only plastic can keep shape like that, flesh boobs of this size will at least fall a little or be deformed by the clothings
so I vote: FAKE! --Bibal 18:31, 15 January 2008 (EST)
Well, for my part, I'm almost certain her boobs are real, as I have a really good eye at these things. The fact that her boobs looks bigger is only due to the top she's wearing, as it is pushing her boobd higher... To be absolutely true, however, there is one thing I can't believe. It's her supposedly 19" waist size. A little too small a number to believe it (even if I'd love it to be true :)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeremfg (talkcontribs) 06:59, 27 March 2008. To sign talk pages, add ~~~~ after your comments.
Whether they are real or not, I don't think it's accetable to write "no" due to personal opinions when she never even did a single topless shot. But I'll let the admins decide. -Biguns 07:34, 27 March 2008 (EDT)
since there's no conclusive evidence either way, it's best to leave the field empty. --Hexvoodoo 20:29, 27 March 2008 (EDT)
I agree with you. There is not a nude picture to certify fakeness. --CarterMcCoy 19:15, 19 November 2010 (EST)

Proof Denise Milani's fantastic boobs are indeed fake

This is the link to a thread on a forum where they are debating if Denise boobs are real or fake a little down on the first page it's proven that her breasts are fake.

http://www.pwsforums.com/showthread.php?t=101860&highlight=iMatt+investigative

- Agreed it is obvious she got implants, here is a new upload of comparison pic: [[1]]

I agree, and I think too that her boobs are fakes. We can see some Denise Milani's ancient photos at SportsByBrooks or others sets like this and this, that her boobs were smaller and were falling like "normal" boobs. Of course, her tits were big yet, but if they grown, they took a too huge volume and like said Bibal they "have a perfectly round shape" and it was not the case before. So I think FAKE...! Gh0st 2014-01-22

Location of birth

Afetr I had studied the set called "my town" or "Czech town" I came to a conclusion it is Frýdek-Místek, a small town in the north-east cornenr of the Czech Republic. I came to a deduction, that it is the town where Denise was born or where she lived before she moved to US. So, I added the information to the article. I know I myay be mistaken. Well, the town in the pictures really is Frýdek-Místek, or better to say it is Místek, one of the two parts of the town, that is 100% sure, but she might have been born in another town and the pictures were taken in Frýdek-Místek and the set was named "My town" only because her parents live in the town now. Frýdek-Místek on the google maps: http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&hl=en&geocode=&q=Fr%C3%BDdek-M%C3%ADstek&ie=UTF8&ll=50.176898,18.413086&spn=15.465962,33.925781&z=5&iwloc=addr The town has its article at Wikipedia, too.--BobbyLaurel 04:54, 6 September 2008 (EDT)

I corrected the name of the country where Denise was born. As she was born in 1980, the correct name of the country is Czechoslovakia. Czechoslovakia split into the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic in 1st Jan 1993. See Wikipedia. --BobbyLaurel 05:00, 6 September 2008 (EDT)

Measurements

I'm not sure but I'm fairly certain that 32 inch bust,is way out of date just picture evidence indicate a good 4 to 6 inches more than her hip measurement at this point. Sochwa

Marital Status

I've heared somewhere that denise is married and is a mother to a 9 yr old son (a MILF?); Is there anything out there that can back up this argument? --Oren neu dag 18:31, 2 November 2009 (EST)

Not solid proof that she's boobs are fake.

The link that an user of up here posted are dead, so, there's not solid proff that she's boobs are fake, so i have edited the article.--AsteroidJuice 21:49, 18 June 2014 (EDT)

Solid proof

Here's another link. [[2]]

I myself don't mind either way, but it is obvious to see Denise has implants.

If really has implants, why she wanted to do her big boobs bigger? i that "comparision" her breast looks big "before" anyway --AsteroidJuice 02:24, 23 July 2014 (EDT)

Why bigger ? Same has any other model that goes for augmentations : bigger boobs = more fame and money.--Ikki 01:03, 22 November 2014 (EST)

Fake tits are fake

[[3]]

[[4]]

--Ikki 16:00, 18 November 2014 (EST)

Enhanced

It boggles the mind how, even in the face of overwhelming evidence, the field is left blank. Milani was among the most popular non-nude glamour models of her time and nobody (fan or otherwise) would reasonably claim her breasts are natural.

I've said it about Abigail Ratchford in The Honorable's talk page (still awaiting answer, by the way) and I'll say it again here: the only reason certain models are listed as "Natural" or the field left blank is because of some users who refuse to come to terms with the glaringly obvious reality. Sadly, most of these users are incapable of even carrying out discussions, let alone provide evidence to support their claims.

Boobpedia suffers from blatant inconsistency in sources: some claims of natural/enhanced are backed by sources which are not accepted in other articles, while others are simply unbacked, but nobody cares to leave the field blank. Solid, undisputable sources are almost impossible to come across. Few models will publicly state they've undergone surgery—some because the question is never raised in the first place, others because it's obvious, and others simply because they won't admit it, either for personal reasons (pride, embarrassment) or professional ones (they want to keep the fantasy/illusion going for fans).

Plastic surgery has come a long way and certain models have remarkable implants that sometimes look unbelievably natural (e.g. Malene Espensen). Others look good enough to give the benefit of the doubt, and I can certainly respect that. Leanne Crow is a great example; until an ultrasound is done, we'll be left guessing. But when you have photographic evidence (particularly before/after photos within a certain timeframe) and at least one functional eyeball, what is the excuse? Mind you, in my personal opinion, Denise Milani belongs to neither of the above categories. Her implants are as obvious as Jordan Carver's.

Of course, none of that matters when you read the above discussion and pay attention to all the unanswered claims of proof and all the delusional editors whose only edits are in the way of making sure the word "Enhanced" is left out of their favorite models' articles no matter what. —Squalla1 12:28, 12 December 2015 (EST)